Conflict
Resolution through Mediation
By Michael
Sledge, University Residences Judicial Officer, Western Washington University
Mediation
is an often-used approach by Resident Advisors, especially in resolving
roommate conflicts. It can be a satisfying and fulfilling way to reach
resolution on some very sticky matters. It can help the individuals
involved become better communicators and be more prepared to handle
conflict in the future. It can also help restore a healthy community.
Technically,
mediation is defined as a process in which individuals seek to talk
through their differences with the help of a neutral third party and
reach a mutually-agreed upon resolution. Mediation can be superior to
other conflict resolution methods because the individuals, or disputants,
create their own solutions and consequently have more investment in
the resolution. A true mediation allows each side to share their perspective,
listen to the other perspective, engage in dialogue, respect the rights
and thoughts of others, and brainstorm possible solutions before arriving
at a resolution. Mediation is a healthy way to share concerns and helps
people learn how to resolve conflict in a positive manner.
Having
a deeper understanding of mediation as a process can increase the chances
that everyone will be pleased with the resolution. If you’re not
properly prepared, you can do more damage than you think. The others
involved may not only be dissatisfied with the process, but they may
not seek outside help with disputes in the future. The more often you
mediate, the better you’ll be as a mediator. Remember about the
importance of training, and if you are unsure of your skills in this
area, ask your supervisor for support, assistance, and training.
The following
information should help you in your role as mediator:
Set
ground rules
And once
you set them, make sure that everyone sticks to them. Common ground
rules include not interrupting, not engaging in name-calling, listening
well, being courteous, and maintaining privacy at the conclusion of
the mediation session. As the mediator, it is your job to call people
on their behavior when they break a rule. And you must do so in a non-judgmental
manner so you can continue to be perceived as neutral and not taking
one side over the other.
Trust
the mediation process
Mediation
as a process can be extraordinarily helpful, but it must be adhered
to and trusted in order to work properly. Your role is, in part, to
be a good role model and to help move the disputants along from one
part of the process to the next, continually moving toward a resolution.
While doing so, you should be engaging in reflective listening, and
restating and reframing concerns and issues that arise. It is your job
to moderate the language used. For example, if a disputant says “She
never turns her alarm clock off; that’s disrespectful to me,”
you could restate that by saying “So what you’re saying
is you are concerned because her alarm clock rings, and you don’t
feel respected because of that.”
Understand
the limits of mediation
Mediation
can be most helpful in many roommate or community disputes. There are,
however, a number of circumstances in which mediation is not the proper
solution. In instances where violence has occurred, or may occur, mediation
is inappropriate because either the threatening atmosphere places one
of the disputants at a disadvantage, or a disputant enters the mediation
with motives that are incompatible with the process. For the same reasons,
sexual assault, dating violence or stalking are also poor choices for
mediation. Lastly, disputes that involve individuals with a wide disparity
in power (e.g. dean of a department and a student) can be problematic
and are not advisable.
Be
neutral
Some professional
mediators would say that a true mediator shouldn’t know any of
the parties involved in a mediation session. Others would say that as
long as you can be neutral, and are perceived to be neutral, you can
operate as a mediator. It helps to note any relationship that you have
with the parties involved. For example, it’s all right to say
“Even though Joe was my resident last year and I’ve known
him longer, I believe I can be a neutral mediator in this process. Are
you both okay with that?” Of course the best course of action
would be to have another RA mediate a dispute between your residents.
You could return the favor when other RA’s have disputes within
their community. This insures neutrality, both in real and perceived
terms.
Take
appropriate time
Your residents
have 45 minutes between classes and they want you to do the mediation
in that time? Look for another opportunity to meet with them. One of
the biggest mistakes in mediation is not allowing enough time for the
process to take place. All parties (including you) need to have two
hours, at minimum, to get things going. And everyone should understand
that you may not get finished in that time; you may need to schedule
another time (or times) to keep the process going. Time is a limited
resource, especially for college students, but it is one of the key
ingredients for a successful mediation.
Be
patient
While
it may seem that all the issues are on the table, there may be more
lurking unseen to your eye. If either or both disputants seem hesitant
or can’t seem to move forward, there may be more going on than
you are aware of. If you try to move along too quickly, issues that
need attention can be left out and consequently come back to haunt you,
and the disputants, later. Make certain through restating and reframing
concerns and issues that everything is out in the open before moving
on. And remember that just because you feel like you’re ready
for the next step doesn’t mean it’s time to take that step.
Everyone involved must be ready to do so or mediation doesn’t
work.
Do
not offer solutions
Many people
attracted to the RA position are natural helpers, and many RA’s
reflexively offer ideas, suggestions or solutions in everyday life.
But offering solutions to problems is not part of the mediation process.
Technically speaking, if the neutral party comes up with the solution,
that’s called arbitration. Another key ingredient in mediation
is to make certain the parties involved are arriving at their own decisions
and solutions. You can ask them prompt questions to get this part of
the process moving (e.g. “Are there any other ideas that you have
about solving this issue?”), but be sure not to lead, or mislead
them. As a staff person, you will be a trusted individual and the participants
might agree with your suggested solution – which might work for
you, but you are not one of the individuals who will be living with
the outcome.
Get
the agreement in writing
Once the
disputants have arrived at a resolution, it is imperative to get the
agreement in writing. But before that, be certain that all the bases
are covered regarding details and feasibility. Play devil’s advocate
and attempt to find problems in the resolution. Ask if everything seems
realistic. Ask what will happen if an agreed-upon term is not met, or
an obligation goes unfulfilled. Once all of the details have been settled,
write down the agreement. Make certain that each disputant has things
to do in the agreement; it sends a bad message if three-quarters of
the items have one disputant’s name at the beginning (e.g. “Joe
agrees to...”). Each disputant should have a copy to take with
them and refer to as necessary.
Follow-up
It is
a good idea to check back with the disputants in a week or so to ensure
that the mediated solution is being followed and working. If they have
moved away from the agreed upon course of action, you may need to help
the disputants to recommit to their initial agreement, or you may use
the current situation to do a secondary mediation and which will allow
them to outline additional solutions.
With some
formal mediation training and practice, and these tips in mind, you
can be well on your way to helping your residents resolve their conflicts
in a healthy and positive fashion.
About the
Author
Michael
Sledge is the university residences judicial officer at Western Washington
University. He has worked at Western as a resident director and orientation
coordinator prior to his current position. Before that, he worked as
a grad assistant and RA at the University of Iowa, where he received
his BA in English and MA in Higher Education Administration. This article
stems from his experience attending the mediation track of the ASJA
Donald D. Gehring Judicial Affairs Training Institute (which he highly
recommends).