Judicial
Affairs in the Residence Halls: The Role of the Resident Assistant
By Denise O'Neill
Assistant Dean of Students
Hofstra
University
Student
conduct issues in the residence halls is not a new concept. It has been
a concern since the inception of the first residence hall. As faculty
and administration strive to meet the developmental needs of students,
resident assistants join the search for quality standards, civility and
educational opportunities in the location where students spend the majority
of their time - the residence halls.
Resident
Assistants (RA's) can be effective members of the University Judicial
process if three things occur. First and foremost, Resident Assistants
must be clear on their role in the judicial process. Secondly, Resident
Assistants must be familiar with university policies and procedures; they
are primary referral agents for students on campus. Finally, Resident
Assistants must exhibit behavior that is above reproach; they are "front-line"
staff members and they serve as role models for the entire campus community.
The
RA's role is to observe, confront and report inappropriate behavior. Exhibiting
a fair, just and consistent approach while fulfilling this role is extremely
important. This is accomplished by setting firm, clear expectations for
all students at the beginning of the year. Residents are keenly aware
when a RA shirks their responsibilities as a limit setter.
The
role of the RA during the judicial process is completely different than
the role of other staff members in the department. Resident Director's
role is to conduct disciplinary, informational meetings and to initiate
charges with documented students. Judicial/Disciplinary Board members,
who usually volunteer for this responsibility, hear disciplinary cases
and make recommendations to the Director of Judicial Affairs or their
designee. Dean of Students, Vice Presidents, and on rare occasions, Presidents,
hear cases that have been appealed by students. Each role should be clear
and succinct.
Resident
Assistants must be aware of university policies and judicial procedures.
Almost all universities have written policies, which are located in the
student handbook. When students are allegedly involved in incidents that
violate the Student Conduct Code, they meet with a housing or residential
representative (i.e., RD), to discuss the details of the case. During
this meeting, charges are assigned and students are given the opportunity
to accept responsibility or contest the charges via a hearing officer
or hearing board. If a student accepts responsibility for their actions,
a sanction is assigned in writing. Formal sanctions issued to students
who are found responsible for violations of university policy include
written warnings, probation, residence hall relocation, residence hall
removal and/or ban. In rare instances, university suspension or expulsion
can be imposed. Usually, this occurs after a formal hearing has been conducted.
Educational sanctions may include community service, topical seminars,
programs or apology letters.
A
student may choose a formal hearing with a Judicial Board. Some universities
establish Faculty/Administrative boards while others utilize a peer-run
conduct board; hybrid boards are becoming more common. A peer review board
is beneficial in a judicial system. When students see other students participating
on judicial boards, they are more apt to vocalize a sense of fairness.
The hearing option involves the presentation of documented testimony,
the presentation of witnesses and the presentation of testimony by the
accused. Accused students are given the opportunity to question others.
Boards recommend a responsible or not responsible decision for each charge.
The Director of Judicial Affairs issues a formal letter to the student.
A right to an appeal is contained in the letter. All appealed decisions
are final.
The
final expectation for RA's regarding the judicial process is to exhibit
behavior that is beyond reproach and free from impropriety. Residential
Life Departments should develop a code of ethics that RA's are required
to follow while they are in this position. Resident Assistants need to
be aware of FERPA (Family Educational Right to Privacy Act) guidelines
which protects a student's right to privacy with regard to educational
records. Discussions regarding ongoing judicial cases should not be entertained
with others, except as necessary for the resolution of the case. Confidentiality
should be maintained and respected. If a RA is called as a university
witness, they should make themselves available for the hearing to reinforce
all written documents that have been submitted. RA's should not be swayed
by personal biases or partisan demands before, during or after an incident
has occurred.
Residence
halls are inevitably the location where students test the limits of university
rules and regulations. Resident Assistants play a vital role in the adjudication
of violations by confronting inappropriate behavior, documenting incidents,
serving as witnesses at judicial board hearings and serving as positive
role models. The fundamental elements of the Student Code of Conduct are
protected by the actions of the staff members who are interacting with
students on a daily basis - the Resident Assistants.
About the Author
Denise
O'Neill is the Assistant Dean of Students at Hofstra University, as well
as a Doctoral Candidate at the Teachers College, Columbia University.
Denise has held former positions as the Assistant Director of Residential
Life at Hofstra, Assistant to the Director/Resident Director at Western
Connecticut State University, and Area Coordinator and Resident Director
at Marist College and Keystone Junior College, and Resident Assistant
at Moravian College. Denise has served NEACUHO in the role of Diversity
Education Chairperson, Legal Issues Chairperson, and Residence Education
Chairperson, and District Coordinator for Eastern New York.